The Federal Government has intensified its criminal case against former Kaduna State governor, Nasir El-Rufai, by filing an amended five-count charge that introduces new allegations linked to national security and access to classified information.
The revised charges, filed on April 13, 2026, before the Federal High Court in Abuja, replace an earlier three-count case. At his arraignment before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, El-Rufai pleaded not guilty to all charges after the court approved the substitution.
Prosecuting counsel, representing the Department of State Services, explained that the amended charge significantly broadens the scope of the case. While the original charges focused on alleged unlawful interception of communications, the new filing introduces accusations of interference with critical national infrastructure and unauthorised access to classified state information.
One of the new counts alleges that El-Rufai unlawfully interfered with communications belonging to the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, which are classified as part of Nigeria’s critical national information infrastructure. Another count claims he accessed classified details regarding Ribadu’s arrest and detention order without authorisation.
The amended charge also retains earlier allegations, including unlawful interception of communications and the use of technical systems that could compromise national security and public safety.
During proceedings, the prosecution requested an accelerated hearing schedule and sought to protect the identities of two witnesses by using pseudonyms, citing security concerns. The defence opposed this, arguing it would infringe on the defendant’s right to know his accusers. Additional disagreements arose over access to evidence and the validity of the amended charges, with the defence filing a motion to quash them.
Justice Abdulmalik adjourned the case to May 18, 19, and 20, 2026, for further hearing.
Separately, a Kaduna State High Court denied El-Rufai’s bail application, citing the seriousness of the allegations and concerns that he could interfere with investigations. The court ruled that he should remain in custody under the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission pending trial.
Despite arguments from the defence regarding his health, community ties, and willingness to cooperate, the court found no sufficient grounds for release. It also noted the absence of medical evidence to support his health claims.
The trial is expected to proceed on an accelerated schedule, with hearings set for early June 2026, as the former governor remains in custody awaiting the full hearing of the case.
